'Bad' is TOTALLY subjective. Thus, this thread is simply people's opinions of which bands they think are bad. You're never gonna generate an Absolute True list of 'bad' bands or 'good' bands b/c everyone's tastes vary. If you read my original post, I even pointed that out:
(paraphrased) "if you agree with the bands on someone's list, you can trust their recommendations more. If you disagree with their list, you should be leery of any recommendations they make b/c you have different tastes".
That's all the thread does. My saying "Hell is awful" doesn't make it an absolute truth any more than you saying "Hell is awesome!" makes it absolute truth. You like 'em, I don't. It's not a question of who's right or wrong, it's just opinions.
Take-home lesson: we probably shouldn't take each other's recommendations too seriously; if I say something sucks you might like it, and vice verse.
Buried By Time and Dust wrote:The Topic wasn't what NWOBHM Nightsblood liked.The Topic was about Bad NWOBHM and some people visit this board for references so they should know that some of the acts you mentioned aren't bad NWOBHM but just bands you don't care for.They aren't bad.
nightsblood wrote:.
Re: to those sniping at people for giving honest answers- Would you rather have people claim to love those seminal albums when they really don't? Last time I checked that's pretty much the definition of 'poser'. I could claim to love Hell to look more 'true' or whatever, but screw that; they just don't appeal to me and I'm not gonna lie about it. I like what I like, and I don't like what I don't like, which is all the topic asked. I don't think there will ever be an album that 100% of metal fans like or dislike, so there's no point in harshing on folks for disagreeing with your tastes. Get over it