Uncompromising war on metallic modernism under the dictatorship of The Corroseum.
https://thecorroseum.org/forum/
I think, almost every record is worth to be reissued, but in my opinion HR are doing way too much releases.Herkus Monte wrote: You mean some records rereleased by HR did not deserve to be reissued?
buy it,trade it, stumble upon it....life is a mystery manTrigger wrote:You really believe you would ever buy it???MEXDefenderOfSteel wrote:also a really cool one by blower: Veto both albums in oneWarepire wrote: Rotor - Árvaház, Blower Records, Mexico, Very nice reissue of an unreleased Rotor album with lyrics to most of the songs, band photos, some story behind the reissue process etc.
had to add: MILITIA-RELEASED (another one of those releases which saved me a thousand bucks hunting for them)
yeah...and out of nowhere we could also see Pelle "Dead" on "Bewitched" video. How many did know this fact before the re-issue CD?Warepire wrote:Candlemass reissue series on Swedish Powerline records, 2001 are pretty sweet. Band photos, lyrics, and a whole CD worth of bonus materials.
Needless to worry about spending thousands of bucks for it thenMEXDefenderOfSteel wrote:buy it,trade it, stumble upon it....life is a mystery manTrigger wrote:You really believe you would ever buy it???MEXDefenderOfSteel wrote:
also a really cool one by blower: Veto both albums in one
had to add: MILITIA-RELEASED (another one of those releases which saved me a thousand bucks hunting for them)
I think that if Rob thinks a release of yours is shit that he is entitled tp say so. Dan said it best in the rules with: "consensus is for hippies." I realize that you are the guy behind the label and because of this are obviously sensitive about the issue and even though you had to jump through hurdles to get the material for the release, it doesn't mean that you shouldn’t receive any criticism over it. Rob was a customer and he received a product that he wasn’t happy with. Sure you refunded him but that doesn’t mean that he should just sweep the issue under the rug and keep it as his dirty little secret. I work in the casino industry and have had several meetings regarding marketing and customer service. Applying this knowledge to this issue I will tell you that a happy customer will tell an average of 10 people about the great experience they had where as an unhappy customer will tell an average of 25 people about the terrible experience they had. This is just human nature.stormspell wrote:Dude, this is the second time you're telling this release is unlistenable giving you a massive migraines. What else could I do but to refund you?
Nor did I ever asked you to change your opinion. I was just saddened and disappointed to see you expressing your opinion in public every time this topic pops up. You of all people to whom I've explained personally the situation and all the hurdles we had to cross just to see this release out. A fellow label owner who would know of all those things, or so I thought...
And since I'm at it, let me clarify one more thing: all your comments of how the old tape rips are better are inaccurate. There are NO tape rips for the demo II. This demo was never even mixed before Dave transferred the multi-track tapes and mixed and mastered it - so what he gave us is ALL that is available, ever! At the end it was down to THIS sound, or NO release! There was a lot of bleeding in the drum tracks, and a particularly nasty reverb effect throughout, so it was sonically challenged from the start and a lot of compromises had to be made. It is not like we took a pristine recording and slammed it down you know, quite to the contrary.
Seriously, how do you expect me to not get upset when you know it is impossible to provide a better product, yet keep telling otherwise?
Anyhow, it is probably all my fault. I really should stop carrying so much. Apologies to everyone who had to read through this rant.
A little discrepancy here from my Saxonian friend. Either a re-issue is of high quality, then it deserved to be put out or it is not.Nasty Uwe wrote:I think, almost every record is worth to be reissued, but in my opinion HR are doing way too much releases.Herkus Monte wrote: You mean some records rereleased by HR did not deserve to be reissued?
I'm not criticizing the musical quality but the amount of records.
Have to agree on the Master Hammer 2CD. I bought it from a nice fellow on this forum. I'm not big on MH so this 2CD pack is really "value for money" for me. And it looks really nice (on the other hand, the LP purple version looks like shit).slayerhatesusall wrote:I really like the Master's hammer- Ritual/ jilemnice occutist reissue, nice digipak design with cool artwork and it just looks really good. Also the Target- master project genesis/ mission executed reissue is pretty awesome.
There's a Deep Switch CD (private pressing) before the SK's reissue.Divine Victim wrote:Doesn't your Deep Switch nomination break that rule then? I didn't realise it had an earlier CD release but I may well be mistaken.mega_lodon wrote:Note that I only count those titles that are reissued on the same media format as the originals. The purpose is to make a comparison of new and old versions. Ok, let the shoot-out begins.
I really wouldn't know, perhaps you should ask the professional around here, It seems to always be on his mind.stormspell wrote:Avenger, thank you for your invaluable insight. I think I should go masturbate now, I've heard it helps relaxation
It's released on No Remorse Records.CloudsOfMetal wrote:Anyone have their opinions on that Randy cd re-issue? I can't remember what label made it though.