The difference would be that Langquist had no real history prior to singing for Candlemass and all he has done since has been far from the spotlight. Whereas if you mention Vikström's name to a swede he'll probably start humming "fuh-reeeeeeeee like an eagle" spontaneously. But yeah, it surely is as dumb a reason as can be.Black Axe wrote:That's a really dumb reason. Johan Langquist sang in similar genre's too after he left.mordred wrote:In Sweden many reject it just based on the change of vocalist, many times without even listening to the album. The thing about Thomas Vikström is that he started his carreer as an 18 year old in an AOR band that had a national hit with the song "Free Like an Eagle" in the late eighties. To a lot of swedes he's closely associated with that one song and thus many labeled him an "AOR vocalist" that could not possibly fit in a doom metal band. Which is of course ridiculous, because Vikström has sung AOR and doom metal and pretty much every HM/HR genre in between and then some, including major parts in national musical theatre. AOR vocalist my ass, but that's the way a lot of people see it, regardless of reality. It's sad I think.
If you won't be listening to certain Candlemass era because the singer sang in a 'bad' genre, they shouldn't listen to anything with Messiah(Requiem...).
I challenge anyone to try and say that Vikström did not have the range and power required to sing for Candlemass. Just check this out:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BGMlqr7iA8g